Vladro

The issue with the prequels isn't that they're bad, it's that they're being compared to the rose tinted glasses that people have for the original trilogy. The original trilogy really had some terrible character development. None of them were remotely relatable which gave no attachment to them. The only one to have any development at all was Han Solo, who was supposed to be a supporting character. 

Yeah I kind of agree with that heartless. Luke had a little development, and Leah had next to none. Other than them, who else are you referring too? 

Darth Vader was kinda meh to be honest as was nearly all Sith minus the emperor. I didn't like how it was implied that Qui-Gon Jinn was a grey jedi and never flushed that out into a dynamic storyline. I have to be honest, George Lucas is a terrible story writer. The most popular character of the original trilogy was Boba Fett and he said an amazing 16 words throughout all 3 movies. There wasn't any relatable human aspects to any of them except Han Solo, who was the only one to show actual human being characteristics. They weren't bad movies, don't get me wrong, but they're not the perfect movies that people paint them out to be. Which is the main reason everyone automatically hates on the prequels so much, they have an artificially high opinion on originals that's not based in reality.